Paper recommender · OpenAlex computer-science corpus

Find the next paper worth reading.

Pick any arXiv ML paper and four models return their most-similar work, side by side: a tuned hybrid, a sentence-transformer, classic TF-IDF, and a citation-graph model, all measured against a popularity baseline. Latency badges are live calls; the leaderboard is held-out evaluation with bootstrap confidence intervals.

0.199MAP@1020xvs popularity59.4 msp95

Popularity(baseline)
TF-IDF
Neural
Citation ALS
Hybrid

Best MAP@10 · hybrid

0.199

20x the popularity baseline

Hit-rate@10 · hybrid

0.43

finds a citation 14x as often

p95 latency · hybrid

59.4ms

top-10 over 28,436 papers

Catalogue

28,436

CS arXiv papers since 2019

Step 1

Choose a seed paper

Type a title or author. The FastAPI service does the lookup.

top-k

Seed paper

Step 2

Recommendations, side by side

pick a seed paper above

Hybrid

TF-IDF + neural + ALS + popularity, weights tuned on held-out NDCG

Pick a seed to see results

Neural

MiniLM sentence-transformer over title + abstract, cosine

Pick a seed to see results

TF-IDF

Title + abstract + authors + topic, sparse cosine

Pick a seed to see results

Citation ALS

Implicit ALS over citing → cited edges, 96 latent factors

Pick a seed to see results

Offline evaluation

How the five algorithms actually score

Held-out citations, 2,000 seeds, top-10, bootstrap 95% CIs. Hybrid is the deployed model.

Algorithm	MAP@10	NDCG@10	Recall@10	Hit-rate	Coverage	p95 ms
Popularity	0.0098	0.0147	0.0293	0.031	0.000	0.2
TF-IDF	0.1491	0.1872	0.3070	0.312	0.386	53.0
Neural	0.1214	0.1560	0.2659	0.271	0.366	4.6
Citation ALS	0.0513	0.0694	0.1275	0.133	0.181	0.7
Hybriddeployed	0.1993	0.2541	0.4258	0.434	0.272	59.4

MAP@10

NDCG@10

Recall@10